We use functional cookies to operate the site and, with your consent, Google Analytics cookies for visitor statistics. You can accept all or limit to functional only. Learn more about cookies.
The L0–L5 scale inherits the TM Forum AN baseline and describes autonomy of a single agent or product. L6 and L7 extend it for agent systems: an orchestrator that creates agents, and an ecosystem that develops its own infrastructure and rules.
L0
Manual
System monitors only — no automated actions.
Human role
All actions performed manually.
Real-world example
A blinking server light. The admin reads logs and reacts.
Arcanada context
No active Arcanada components live at L0 — every product passes at least the L1 gate.
Projects currently rated at this level in the registry:
AWS Auto Scaling driven by CloudWatch — a metric crosses threshold and the system scales out. The decision is policy-driven, the human approves the policy, not each action.
Arcanada context
Target level for Munera, Support, Scrutator, Model Connector, Agent Dreamer, Email Agent, ARCA Assistant.
Projects currently rated at this level in the registry:
Cross-domain self-detection, self-diagnosis, self-recovery. Retry-with-classification, circuit breakers, fallback chains, state checkpointing, recovery audit trail, known-fix mapping, post-recovery verification, hard cost circuit breakers for LLM calls.
Human role
Exception handling only — unknown-unknown failures.
Real-world example
Kubernetes self-healing (pod crash → reschedule), Netflix Chaos Monkey, Spinnaker auto-rollback. Plus, for AI agents: hard cost CB (the $437 OpenAI runaway-loop story is what kills you without one).
Arcanada context
Target for Verdicus, Transcribator, Ops Bot (first self-healing pilot), Auth Arcana, Disk Arcana, Agent Dreamer.
L5
Fully Autonomous · Self-Optimizing
Closed-loop across services. Proactive self-improvement: A/B testing prompts and models, dynamic model routing, cost governance with auto-downgrade, eval-driven prompt refinement, knowledge graph evolution.
Human role
Sets intent. No routine interaction.
Real-world example
A self-driving system tuning its own routing policies based on observed traffic patterns and a labeled outcome dataset.
Arcanada context
Strategic horizon — not a 2026 deliverable. Candidates: Transcribator (when volume crosses 1000+/day), Model Connector (multi-provider routing). Hard cost CB and labeled eval dataset are non-negotiable prerequisites.
L6
Orchestrator Autonomy · Self-Assembly
The autonomous unit is no longer only an executor. An orchestrator can notice a recurring class of work, design a specialized agent, assign tools and memory, constrain permissions, define tests, run it in a sandbox, evaluate quality, plug it into the workflow, and roll it back if it fails.
Human role
Defines the boundary: which agents may be created, which tools and budgets are allowed, which tests are mandatory, and which actions still require approval.
Real-world example
A Datarim-like orchestrator that creates a new reviewer or publisher agent for a repeated workflow, verifies it against historical cases, and disables it when quality drops.
Arcanada context
Research horizon for Datarim, Consilium, Publisher, Control Arcana, and Managed Project Spaces. L6 is not "many agents"; it is autonomous design of an agent team under explicit limits.
L7
Ecosystem Autonomy · Self-Development
The whole ecosystem can observe agent health, find bottlenecks, convene councils, compare architecture options, build eval datasets, maintain internal documentation, update its own rules, plan development, reallocate resources, and build tools for itself under human-set constraints.
Human role
Acts as legislator, not operator: mission, forbidden actions, budgets, legal and ethical constraints, escalation criteria, stop conditions, and review cadence.
Real-world example
An agent ecosystem that proposes a new service, runs a multi-role council, records objections and rollback plans, allocates a budget, implements in a sandbox, and asks for approval only at hard gates.
Arcanada context
Long-term Arcanada direction: an operational ecosystem with memory, councils, infrastructure loops, research, governance, and explicit rollback. This is not AGI; it is an autonomous engineering organization made of agents.
Why the upper pair exists
L6 and L7 measure not the executor, but the system that creates executors
L5 answers: how can the agent do its job better? L6 asks a different question: what new working unit should exist so this class of tasks is no longer handled manually? L7 raises the scale again: how does the whole ecosystem make decisions, build infrastructure, remember failures, and change its own rules without losing human-set boundaries? These levels do not call the system AGI; they make it engineerable.